London 2012.. here's the website..

[Ben]

I thought the London 2012 logo was bad - I've just seen the website. 

I'd got sore eyes from looking at it - I think it's terrible, look very amateur. The use of pink/yellow on the homepage is headache inducing.

http://www.london2012.com/

http://www.london2012.com/blog/index.php (1993 called, they want their colours back....)

Is it really as bad as I think? 

[chavalier]

http://www.london2012.com/index.php?stylesheet=dyslexia

style sheet dyslexia puts the logo over the text area in IE. I suppose it doesn't matter cos teh dumb fucks can't read

[Chris H]

I wonder how much that cost?

A small fortune methinks.

[Chris H]

http://www.london2012.com/index.php?stylesheet=dyslexia

style sheet dyslexia puts the logo over the text area in IE. I suppose it doesn't matter cos teh dumb fucks can't read

 

Makes the logo look like an old dear getting steamed by some 'crew'.

[Chris H]

  Try using the text size switcher. It's a novel way to do it.

[Curry]

Surely that can't be the real one, it's somebody taking the piss right? 


and that text size switcher thing confused me at first. I was left thinking WTF?

[sickpuppy]

MY EYES!!

[Ben]

Surely that can't be the real one, it's somebody taking the piss right? 

It must be that the London 2012 people decided on what the site should be.. I keep thinking that I'd love to know which company produced this... or will no-one own up. :lol

[Chris H]

This is in the head

content="kitsite.com"

Either they left it in by mistake or the coders have been paid by a competitor to add it.

[Ben]

That could be the content management system they are using?

[Chris H]

That could be the content management system they are using?

Either way, mud sticks.

[Haze]

How bad is that... damn... isn't that a bad omen for our performance, if this is all they can come up with....

Andy