DotDragnet
May 23, 2012, 02:56:35 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Mobile users - Our forum is Tapatalk enabled. http://www.tapatalk.com/
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: photography in public and the lords  (Read 2043 times)
Britman
Full Member
***
Posts: 195



View Profile Awards
« on: July 23, 2008, 09:19:01 PM »

http://www.ephotozine.com/article/Review-of-street-photography-makes-it-to-the-House-of-Lords

my opinion is posted below the article.
Logged
rutty
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1260



rutty_uk
View Profile WWW Awards
« Reply #1 on: July 23, 2008, 09:55:51 PM »

There's a lot of discussion about this on lots of the sites that I visit. BoingBoing has regular whinges at the idiots that want to stop us taking photos in public places.

We'll see where this goes. We do NOT need more legislation - we just need the police, the pretend police fuckwits and these so-called security monkeys to leave us the screw alone
Logged

Shirker
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1625



View Profile WWW Awards
« Reply #2 on: July 24, 2008, 08:58:04 AM »

Not a popular view, but if I'm outside and someone takes my photo, that's one thing. But I'm not happy about them then having the right to monetise it and make a living from it.
Logged

sickpuppy
Site Chimp
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1912



sickpuppysoftwa
View Profile WWW Awards
« Reply #3 on: July 24, 2008, 09:08:22 AM »

Not a popular view, but if I'm outside and someone takes my photo, that's one thing. But I'm not happy about them then having the right to monetise it and make a living from it.
That's what model release forms are for. If you are recognisable in a photo then the photographer should get you to consent to him using your image for commercial use. A lot of the agencies wouldn't touch an image without these forms. Crowds you can get away with but if for example you were photographed playing tennis scratching your bum then he'd need your permission before athena could print the posters.
Logged

Shirker
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1625



View Profile WWW Awards
« Reply #4 on: July 24, 2008, 09:33:10 AM »

laugh I like the Athena image. A fat northerner, grasping a greasy burger in one hand, and scratching a hairy bum cheek partly covered by grey washed out boxers. That would be a big seller.
Logged

slaughteredlamb
DDN Contributor
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1089



peakoverload
View Profile WWW Awards
« Reply #5 on: July 24, 2008, 09:56:27 AM »

Not a popular view, but if I'm outside and someone takes my photo, that's one thing. But I'm not happy about them then having the right to monetise it and make a living from it.
That's what model release forms are for. If you are recognisable in a photo then the photographer should get you to consent to him using your image for commercial use.

That's not to say that the photo couldn't be sold for editorial use without the need for a model release. If you are standing on public ground then there is nothing you can do, there are no laws to stop anyone from taking your photo unless they are breaking another law in doing so. That photo can then be sold for editorial use and you wouldn't have a leg to stand on UNLESS the photo was used in such a way as to damage your character. For example if a photo of a group of teenagers laughing in the street where to be used under a headline of "Teenage Yobs" the people in the photo would have grounds to sue for defamation of character. If you are on private ground then things get a little more complicated especially as many people, including many photographers, security guards and police, have a very confused impression as to what actually is private ground and it is in this confusion that most complaints occur.
Logged
rutty
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1260



rutty_uk
View Profile WWW Awards
« Reply #6 on: July 25, 2008, 01:55:05 PM »

Another example where idiots trample over common sense:

http://www.metro.co.uk/news/article.html?in_article_id=232145&in_page_id=34

Quote
An amateur photographer was told she could not take snaps of an empty paddling pool because she might be a paedophile.

Betty Robinson was ordered to put away her camera by a council worker when she began snapping the outdoor pool.

'It's absolutely ridiculous – it's bureaucracy gone mad,' said the 82-year-old widow from Southampton.


Pillocks
Logged

Jeewhizz
DDN Contribs
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1626



View Profile Awards
« Reply #7 on: August 25, 2008, 10:17:49 AM »

Some more here: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/08/23/camera_analysis/
Logged

Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF | SMF © 2006-2008, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!